<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; RX65e</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/rx65e/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX65e ka1</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-ka1</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-ka1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-ka1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[El Bel me detecta este supuesto radar sobresemáforo en la banda ka1. Duration : 0:0:34 [youtube RX86mipwu18]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RX86mipwu18/2.jpg" align="left">El Bel me detecta este supuesto radar sobresemáforo en la banda ka1.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:34</b></p>
<p><span id="more-303"></span><br />[youtube RX86mipwu18]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-ka1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX65e PL vs. Simicon Kriss P</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-pl-vs-simicon-kriss-p</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-pl-vs-simicon-kriss-p#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fotoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kriss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simicon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suszarka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-pl-vs-simicon-kriss-p</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wykrywanie fotoradaru Simicon Kriss P przez Beltronics RX65e w wersji na Polskę. Duration : 0:0:31 [youtube LDk41I6YGOM]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LDk41I6YGOM/2.jpg" align="left">Wykrywanie fotoradaru Simicon Kriss P przez Beltronics RX65e w wersji na Polskę.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:31</b></p>
<p><span id="more-300"></span><br />[youtube LDk41I6YGOM]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-pl-vs-simicon-kriss-p/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Backward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ltkKEzDyibw/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span><br />[youtube ltkKEzDyibw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Backward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Forward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YzGBtEwJa2I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:18</b></p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span><br />[youtube YzGBtEwJa2I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX65e &amp; Iskra 1D</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-iskra-1d</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-iskra-1d#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iskra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-iskra-1d</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wykrywanie radaru Iskra 1D przez Beltronics RX65e w wersji na Polskę. Duration : 0:1:56 [youtube uKg2ymsYXFg]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/uKg2ymsYXFg/2.jpg" align="left">Wykrywanie radaru Iskra 1D przez Beltronics RX65e w wersji na Polskę.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:56</b></p>
<p><span id="more-290"></span><br />[youtube uKg2ymsYXFg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65e-iskra-1d/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; RX65e &#8211; 9500i &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:1:41 [youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e8qG2XgjwBg/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-287"></span><br />[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e vs X50 Euro &#8211; Iskra 1D pulse mode</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iskra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testing RX65e vs X50 Euro in Iskra 1D pulse mode. Duration : 0:0:57 [youtube pwLSOgxfQyY]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pwLSOgxfQyY/2.jpg" align="left">Testing RX65e vs X50 Euro in Iskra 1D pulse mode.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:57</b></p>
<p><span id="more-285"></span><br />[youtube pwLSOgxfQyY]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; V1 &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:1:36 [youtube voLQ1nPXl90]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/voLQ1nPXl90/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:36</b></p>
<p><span id="more-277"></span><br />[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e vs RX65 &#8211; K band test &#8211; Is there any difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Bel Pro RX65 rev 6.1 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). Both units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e Ka Narrow: KaN1, KaN2). Duration : 0:2:0 [youtube 3e_3lrMKe6I]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3e_3lrMKe6I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Bel Pro RX65 rev 6.1 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). Both units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e Ka Narrow: KaN1, KaN2).</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:0</b></p>
<p><span id="more-270"></span><br />[youtube 3e_3lrMKe6I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escort X50 EURO vs Beltronics RX65e against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fotoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car) Duration : 0:3:1 [youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zGXUmapOY1Y/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-266"></span><br />[youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

