<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; RDD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/rdd/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spectre 4 RDD versus Beltronics RX65e Radar Detector</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-rx65e-radar-detector</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-rx65e-radar-detector#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-rx65e-radar-detector</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Beltronics RX65e (Euro) was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). The RX65e was detected around 407m away from the Spectre. Duration : 0:1:3 [youtube v7z6o5nLaVY]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/v7z6o5nLaVY/2.jpg" align="left">http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Beltronics RX65e (Euro) was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). The RX65e was detected around 407m away from the Spectre.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:3</b></p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span><br />[youtube v7z6o5nLaVY]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-rx65e-radar-detector/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spectre 4 RDD versus Beltronics GX65 Radar Detector</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-gx65-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-gx65-radar-detector</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-gx65-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-gx65-radar-detector#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel gx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-gx65-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-gx65-radar-detector</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Beltronics GX65 was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). The GX65 was detected around 550m away from the Spectre. Duration : 0:0:54 [youtube X-bEdqkqBaY]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X-bEdqkqBaY/2.jpg" align="left">http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Beltronics GX65 was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). The GX65 was detected around 550m away from the Spectre.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:54</b></p>
<p><span id="more-105"></span><br />[youtube X-bEdqkqBaY]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-gx65-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-gx65-radar-detector/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spectre 4 RDD versus Escort 9500i Radar Detector</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-escort-9500i-radar-detector</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-escort-9500i-radar-detector#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-escort-9500i-radar-detector</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Escort 9500i was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). The 9500i was detected around 215m away from the Spectre. Duration : 0:1:54 [youtube tLiUWyA_LMA]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tLiUWyA_LMA/2.jpg" align="left">http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php<br />
The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Escort 9500i was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror).</p>
<p>The 9500i was detected around 215m away from the Spectre.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:54</b></p>
<p><span id="more-104"></span><br />[youtube tLiUWyA_LMA]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-escort-9500i-radar-detector/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spectre 4 RDD versus Beltronics STi Driver Radar Detector</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-sti-driver-radar-detector</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-sti-driver-radar-detector#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spectre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-sti-driver-radar-detector</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Bel STi Driver (STi XR) was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). As demonstrated in numerous other videos, the STi was not detected by the Spectre 4+ Duration : 0:0:42 [youtube Yfr27xeL4qs]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Yfr27xeL4qs/2.jpg" align="left">http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2009-spectre4-rdd-test.php The Spectre IV+ was set to maximum sensitivity, and the Bel STi Driver (STi XR) was mounted high on the windscreen (next to the rear view mirror). As demonstrated in numerous other videos, the STi was not detected by the Spectre 4+</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:42</b></p>
<p><span id="more-103"></span><br />[youtube Yfr27xeL4qs]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/spectre-4-rdd-versus-beltronics-sti-driver-radar-detector/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

