<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; Ramet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/ramet/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beltronics RX65 vs. Ramet AD9</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/beltronics-rx65-vs-ramet-ad9</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/beltronics-rx65-vs-ramet-ad9#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/beltronics-rx65-vs-ramet-ad9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel RX65 vs. Ramet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VHvX2Subbrk?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VHvX2Subbrk?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Bel RX65 vs. Ramet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/beltronics-rx65-vs-ramet-ad9/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX65 Euro függőleges konzolon Vs. Ramet AD09</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[függőleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[konzolon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beltronics RX65 Euro függőleges konzollal szerelve az elhaladó forgalmat (hátulról) mérő Ramet AD09 telepített radar ellen&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z_liuzHKPjg?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z_liuzHKPjg?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Beltronics RX65 Euro függőleges konzollal szerelve az elhaladó forgalmat (hátulról) mérő Ramet AD09 telepített radar ellen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; RX65e &#8211; 9500i &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:1:41 [youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e8qG2XgjwBg/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-287"></span><br />[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>stacionar kunovice vs. STi-R vertikalne</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/stacionar-kunovice-vs-sti-r-vertikalne</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/stacionar-kunovice-vs-sti-r-vertikalne#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bezpokut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detektor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sti-r"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/stacionar-kunovice-vs-sti-r-vertikalne</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[stacionar kunovice vs. STi-R vertikalne Duration : 0:7:28 [youtube BGO0JwryBcI]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BGO0JwryBcI/2.jpg" align="left">stacionar kunovice vs. STi-R vertikalne</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:7:28</b></p>
<p><span id="more-278"></span><br />[youtube BGO0JwryBcI]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/stacionar-kunovice-vs-sti-r-vertikalne/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; V1 &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:1:36 [youtube voLQ1nPXl90]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/voLQ1nPXl90/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:36</b></p>
<p><span id="more-277"></span><br />[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escort X50 EURO vs Beltronics RX65e against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fotoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car) Duration : 0:3:1 [youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zGXUmapOY1Y/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-266"></span><br />[youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci vs AD9 P &#8211; in the rain</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multanova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Ramet AD9 photoradar (stationary version &#8211; &#8220;P&#8221;; Ka band &#8211; 34.007 GHz). Please notice that rain and moisture seriously reduce detection. Duration : 0:1:38 [youtube OTSXODMl6aM]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OTSXODMl6aM/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Ramet AD9 photoradar (stationary version &#8211; &#8220;P&#8221;; Ka band &#8211; 34.007 GHz). Please notice that rain and moisture seriously reduce detection.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:38</b></p>
<p><span id="more-204"></span><br />[youtube OTSXODMl6aM]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; RX65e &#8211; RX65 &#8211; Pro78 &#8211; 1734 vs Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1734]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) &#8211; Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Beltronics RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) &#8211; Beltronics RX65 (rev 6.3 X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler Pro 78 C (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler 1734 against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car). All RDs POP and SWS off. Duration : 0:2:56 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F7Hsd5ohX24/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) &#8211; Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Beltronics RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) &#8211; Beltronics RX65 (rev 6.3 X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler Pro 78 C (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler 1734 against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car). All RDs POP and SWS off.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:56</b></p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span><br />[youtube F7Hsd5ohX24]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci Vertical &#8211; V1 &#8211; RX65e against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertically]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci mounted Vertically! (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.010 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:1:41 [youtube XcTSLaqg8U4]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XcTSLaqg8U4/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci mounted Vertically! (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.010 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-142"></span><br />[youtube XcTSLaqg8U4]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci Vertical &#8211; V1 3.872 &#8211; RX65e 6.5 against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-3872-rx65e-65-against-ramet-ad9-c-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-3872-rx65e-65-against-ramet-ad9-c-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vertically]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-3872-rx65e-65-against-ramet-ad9-c-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci mounted Vertically! (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) Valentine One 3.872 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, inbuilt within a car) Duration : 0:2:38 [youtube Cg_Mb1SjiJk]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Cg_Mb1SjiJk/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci mounted Vertically! (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) Valentine One 3.872 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:38</b></p>
<p><span id="more-13"></span><br /><center>[youtube Cg_Mb1SjiJk]</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vertical-v1-3872-rx65e-65-against-ramet-ad9-c-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

