<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/pro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I
Duration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ltkKEzDyibw/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span><br />[youtube ltkKEzDyibw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Backward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw
Duration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YzGBtEwJa2I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:18</b></p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span><br />[youtube YzGBtEwJa2I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; RX65e &#8211; 9500i &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)
Duration : 0:1:41
[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e8qG2XgjwBg/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-287"></span><br />[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; V1 &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)
Duration : 0:1:36
[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/voLQ1nPXl90/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:36</b></p>
<p><span id="more-277"></span><br />[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX 65 Pro K-Messung von hinten</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx-65-pro-k-messung-von-hinten-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx-65-pro-k-messung-von-hinten-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx-65-pro-k-messung-von-hinten-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[200 m
Duration : 0:0:22
[youtube jR3gUYGJbHw]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jR3gUYGJbHw/2.jpg" align="left">200 m</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:22</b></p>
<p><span id="more-207"></span><br />[youtube jR3gUYGJbHw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx-65-pro-k-messung-von-hinten-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>K- Test Bel RX 65 Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-test-bel-rx-65-pro</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-test-bel-rx-65-pro#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-test-bel-rx-65-pro</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[450 m
Blitzer zeigt in meiner Richtung
Duration : 0:0:41
[youtube TI2rx84aCis]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TI2rx84aCis/2.jpg" align="left">450 m<br />
Blitzer zeigt in meiner Richtung</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-196"></span><br />[youtube TI2rx84aCis]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-test-bel-rx-65-pro/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; RX65e &#8211; RX65 &#8211; Pro78 &#8211; 1734 vs Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1734]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) &#8211; Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Beltronics RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) &#8211; Beltronics RX65 (rev 6.3 X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler Pro 78 C (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler 1734 against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car). All RDs POP and SWS off.
Duration : 0:2:56
[youtube F7Hsd5ohX24]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/F7Hsd5ohX24/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) &#8211; Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Beltronics RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) &#8211; Beltronics RX65 (rev 6.3 X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler Pro 78 C (X,K,Ka) &#8211; Whistler 1734 against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car). All RDs POP and SWS off.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:56</b></p>
<p><span id="more-161"></span><br />[youtube F7Hsd5ohX24]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BEL STI Driver Ka</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-sti-driver-ka</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-sti-driver-ka#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sti]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-sti-driver-ka</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel STI Ka &#38; RX 65 Pro Vorne
Duration : 0:0:31
[youtube bOTiSvXbmdQ]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bOTiSvXbmdQ/2.jpg" align="left">Bel STI Ka &amp; RX 65 Pro Vorne</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:31</b></p>
<p><span id="more-126"></span><br />[youtube bOTiSvXbmdQ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-sti-driver-ka/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laser Interceptor vs Kustom Pro Laser II</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-vs-kustom-pro-laser-ii</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-vs-kustom-pro-laser-ii#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interceptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kustom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-vs-kustom-pro-laser-ii</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speed reading is instant once I turn off the Laser Interceptors.
Duration : 0:1:6
[youtube SCNetSO9FXY]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SCNetSO9FXY/2.jpg" align="left">Speed reading is instant once I turn off the Laser Interceptors.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:6</b></p>
<p><span id="more-111"></span><br />[youtube SCNetSO9FXY]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-vs-kustom-pro-laser-ii/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci(ZR4s) vs Kustom PLII</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500cizr4s-vs-kustom-plii</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500cizr4s-vs-kustom-plii#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interceptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kustom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500cizr4s-vs-kustom-plii</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Headlight shot.
Duration : 0:0:45
[youtube Oxf7X4-dzrQ]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oxf7X4-dzrQ/2.jpg" align="left">Headlight shot.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:45</b></p>
<p><span id="more-110"></span><br />[youtube Oxf7X4-dzrQ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500cizr4s-vs-kustom-plii/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
