<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; photoradar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/photoradar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I
Duration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ltkKEzDyibw/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span><br />[youtube ltkKEzDyibw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Backward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw
Duration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YzGBtEwJa2I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:18</b></p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span><br />[youtube YzGBtEwJa2I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>V1 &#8211; RX65e &#8211; 9500i &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)
Duration : 0:1:41
[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/e8qG2XgjwBg/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500i (X,K,Ka) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.025 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:41</b></p>
<p><span id="more-287"></span><br />[youtube e8qG2XgjwBg]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-rx65e-9500i-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65 vs K band Photoradar :: 400m</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65-vs-k-band-photoradar-400m</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65-vs-k-band-photoradar-400m#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65-vs-k-band-photoradar-400m</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Pro RX65 rev. 6.1 (standard &#8211; retail v.; X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).
See all test here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=189859F162D16815
Duration : 0:1:3
[youtube LQqlHPLyDDU]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LQqlHPLyDDU/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Pro RX65 rev. 6.1 (standard &#8211; retail v.; X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).<br />
See all test here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=189859F162D16815</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:3</b></p>
<p><span id="more-280"></span><br />[youtube LQqlHPLyDDU]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65-vs-k-band-photoradar-400m/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; V1 &#8211; against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)
Duration : 0:1:36
[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/voLQ1nPXl90/2.jpg" align="left">Valentine One 3.864 (U + X band) vs Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.4 X,K,KaN1,KaN2) vs Escort Passport 9500ci (X,K,Ka, antenna module low in bumper) against Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.004 GHz, inbuilt within a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:36</b></p>
<p><span id="more-277"></span><br />[youtube voLQ1nPXl90]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/rx65e-9500ci-v1-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci vs Fotorapid C (K band photoradar)</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zurad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).
Duration : 0:1:13
[youtube TdQBfNtjZxs]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TdQBfNtjZxs/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:13</b></p>
<p><span id="more-276"></span><br />[youtube TdQBfNtjZxs]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e vs RX65 &#8211; K band test &#8211; Is there any difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Bel Pro RX65 rev 6.1 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). Both units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e Ka Narrow: KaN1, KaN2).
Duration : 0:2:0
[youtube 3e_3lrMKe6I]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3e_3lrMKe6I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Bel Pro RX65 rev 6.1 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). Both units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e Ka Narrow: KaN1, KaN2).</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:0</b></p>
<p><span id="more-270"></span><br />[youtube 3e_3lrMKe6I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-rx65-k-band-test-is-there-any-difference/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escort X50 EURO vs Beltronics RX65e against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fotoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car)
Duration : 0:3:1
[youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zGXUmapOY1Y/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-266"></span><br />[youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci vs Fotorapid C (K band photoradar) #2</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zurad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).
Duration : 0:0:49
[youtube 8-hsIXkZT4I]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8-hsIXkZT4I/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Fotorapid C photoradar (24.125 GHz).</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:49</b></p>
<p><span id="more-218"></span><br />[youtube 8-hsIXkZT4I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-fotorapid-c-k-band-photoradar-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9500ci vs AD9 P &#8211; in the rain</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500ci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multanova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Ramet AD9 photoradar (stationary version &#8211; &#8220;P&#8221;; Ka band &#8211; 34.007 GHz). Please notice that rain and moisture seriously reduce detection.
Duration : 0:1:38
[youtube OTSXODMl6aM]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OTSXODMl6aM/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 9500ci (X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF, antenna module low in bumper) vs Ramet AD9 photoradar (stationary version &#8211; &#8220;P&#8221;; Ka band &#8211; 34.007 GHz). Please notice that rain and moisture seriously reduce detection.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:38</b></p>
<p><span id="more-204"></span><br />[youtube OTSXODMl6aM]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/9500ci-vs-ad9-p-in-the-rain/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
