<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; euro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/euro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Laser Interceptor Laser Jammer Vs. LTI TruSpeed (Euro VPR)</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-laser-jammer-vs-lti-truspeed-euro-vpr</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-laser-jammer-vs-lti-truspeed-euro-vpr#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 9500ci radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interceptor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TruSpeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-laser-jammer-vs-lti-truspeed-euro-vpr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laser Interceptor Laser Jammer jamming TruSpeed (EU VPR Version]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SMFOPqP-Wuc?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SMFOPqP-Wuc?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Laser Interceptor Laser Jammer jamming TruSpeed (EU VPR Version</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/laser-interceptor-laser-jammer-vs-lti-truspeed-euro-vpr/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escort X50 EURO vs Berkut</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 11:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Escort X50E]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TgeTpkTVYlM?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TgeTpkTVYlM?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
New Escort X50E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beltronics STI vs Escort X50 Euro vs Berkut</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/beltronics-sti-vs-escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/beltronics-sti-vs-escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 10:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/beltronics-sti-vs-escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/93EMpAuvDD8?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/93EMpAuvDD8?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/beltronics-sti-vs-escort-x50-euro-vs-berkut/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bel RX65 Euro függőleges konzolon Vs. Ramet AD09</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel rx65 radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[függőleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[konzolon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beltronics RX65 Euro függőleges konzollal szerelve az elhaladó forgalmat (hátulról) mérő Ramet AD09 telepített radar ellen&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>					<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z_liuzHKPjg?fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
					<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z_liuzHKPjg?fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object><br />
Beltronics RX65 Euro függőleges konzollal szerelve az elhaladó forgalmat (hátulról) mérő Ramet AD09 telepített radar ellen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/bel-rx65-euro-fuggoleges-konzolon-vs-ramet-ad09/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Backward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ltkKEzDyibw/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span><br />[youtube ltkKEzDyibw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Backward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Forward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YzGBtEwJa2I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:18</b></p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span><br />[youtube YzGBtEwJa2I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e vs X50 Euro &#8211; Iskra 1D pulse mode</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bel radar detectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iskra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testing RX65e vs X50 Euro in Iskra 1D pulse mode. Duration : 0:0:57 [youtube pwLSOgxfQyY]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pwLSOgxfQyY/2.jpg" align="left">Testing RX65e vs X50 Euro in Iskra 1D pulse mode.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:57</b></p>
<p><span id="more-285"></span><br />[youtube pwLSOgxfQyY]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-radar-detectors/rx65e-vs-x50-euro-iskra-1d-pulse-mode/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Escort X50 EURO vs Beltronics RX65e against Ramet AD9 C</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AD9C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fotoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car) Duration : 0:3:1 [youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zGXUmapOY1Y/2.jpg" align="left">Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO (rev 6.5 X,K,K_PULS,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, RDR,POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Beltronics Professional RX65e (rev 6.5 X,K,KaN1,KaN2 &#8211; ON, POP,SWS &#8211; OFF), Ramet AD9 C photoradar (Ka band: 34.032 GHz, radar antenna under rear bumper of a car)</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-266"></span><br />[youtube zGXUmapOY1Y]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/escort-x50-euro-vs-beltronics-rx65e-against-ramet-ad9-c/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing X50 EURO</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/introducing-x50-euro</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/introducing-x50-euro#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/introducing-x50-euro</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely NEW! Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO &#8211; european version of well known Escort&#8217;s detector. Duration : 0:0:23 [youtube p1vdVsjkr64]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/p1vdVsjkr64/2.jpg" align="left">Absolutely NEW! Escort Passport 8500 X50 EURO &#8211; european version of well known Escort&#8217;s detector.</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:0:23</b></p>
<p><span id="more-216"></span><br />[youtube p1vdVsjkr64]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/introducing-x50-euro/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RX65e vs 9500i vs V995 vs 8500 X50 &#8211; M4 platform K band test</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/rx65e-vs-9500i-vs-v995-vs-8500-x50-m4-platform-k-band-test</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/rx65e-vs-9500i-vs-v995-vs-8500-x50-m4-platform-k-band-test#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9500i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k-band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/rx65e-vs-9500i-vs-v995-vs-8500-x50-m4-platform-k-band-test</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All detectors are build on the same M4 platform &#8211; are they all equal on K band? Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Escort Passport 9500i vs Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3 vs Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jArdTjjZsf0/2.jpg" align="left">All detectors are build on the same M4 platform &#8211; are they all equal on K band?<br />
Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Escort Passport 9500i vs Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3 vs Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3  against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:3:21</b></p>
<p><span id="more-202"></span><br />[youtube jArdTjjZsf0]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/rx65e-vs-9500i-vs-v995-vs-8500-x50-m4-platform-k-band-test/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

