<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radar Detector Experts &#187; 78</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/tag/78/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Backward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ltkKEzDyibw/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Backward test: http://pl.youtube.com/watch?v=YzGBtEwJa2I</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:2:1</b></p>
<p><span id="more-297"></span><br />[youtube ltkKEzDyibw]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-forward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E925 V995 X50 Pro78 RX65e &#8211; extreme K band test &#8211; Backward</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</link>
		<comments>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[escort 8500 radar detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[78]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[925]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[escort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fotorapid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoradar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RX65e]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X50]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2). Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario. See also Forward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YzGBtEwJa2I/2.jpg" align="left">Bel Express 925, Bel Vector 995 rev.6.3, Escort Passport 8500 X50 rev. 6.3, Whistler Pro78 rev.C, Bel Pro RX65e rev. 6.4 vs. Fotorapid C photoradar (K band &#8211; 24.125 GHz). All units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e narrow KaN1-KaN2).<br />
Athermic windshield decreased performance, so it&#8217;s the worst case scenario.<br />
See also Forward test: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltkKEzDyibw</p>
<p>Duration : <b>0:1:18</b></p>
<p><span id="more-292"></span><br />[youtube YzGBtEwJa2I]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-8500-radar-detector/e925-v995-x50-pro78-rx65e-extreme-k-band-test-backward/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

