“real world tests”? As in driving up and down a city highway in 99% of these videos? maybe that’s your real world. it isn’t mine. I don’t know shit. Sorry buddy but I REALLY DO. Your the one defending a completely lame amateur retardo Rd testing club. Not I.
@djrams80 Yes i know. I was about to complain to you D/J about that. Actually I am FAR from a “fanboy” in fact I really didn’t like whistler much till the SE i bought recently now. Hard to type from the couch with my computer D/J it isn’t a laptop. Wish i could. “sucky detector? LMAO ! Yes, most YT videos,ither then yours, show exactly how much it “sucks”
@stalkervision Stupid comments galore here. You clearly don’t know shit! Typical Whistler fanboy, sitting on your couch, defending your sucky detector while people like me do real world comparative testing on Whistler SEs for a month, do semi-controlled testing on a long straight away, around a curve, over a hill, with foam, without foam, etc.etc. I know how they cocmpare to other detectors. You don’t know shit, so shut the fuck up, you fucking retard!
@stalkervision Yes you did fucktard! You said that running two detectors can interfere with each other, which is apparently supposed to explain why the whistlers suck at detecting radar when I run them. Your implication was clearly that my M3 9500ci might be what causes the Whistler to suck. It sucks because it sucks. That’s it. The videos you refer to are always in the middle of fucking nowhere, where any detector would work fine. Give the Whistler any obstacle and it folds.
It is pretty fin arguing with you though D/J. You get so worked up! LOL! i have forgotten more about radar and radar detectors then you know know. EVERY RD encounter is different and every detector will act differently in each different encounter. DID you know this? That’s why I could immediately see your GOL tests are nothing a bunch of contrived BS.
and another thing I find pretty interesting D/J is 99 % of your comparison videos of the SE are done IN THE CITY ! Yes I often SPEED IN THE CITY. Some times doing well over 100 mph in school zones!
@djrams80 Hummm, “someone told me?” LOL! Always a classic ! I didn’t say the M3′s did that did I ? Not that I am aware. The GOl tests don’t reflect what your saying and from what you wrote a minute ago I can’t believe you did what you claim now. Franky the only D/F here is you since I have seen enough counter videos to your that show the SE has outstanding range.
@stalkervision Now you’re going to try to teach me about harmonics? LOL! Wrong again. I’ve been told by someone that has done a full scan on Belscort M3 detectors that there is no signal emitted that would effect another RD outside of a 2 foot radius. The M3s do not beat Spectres by shifting their oscillator emissions.
During the over the hill testing, we tested the windshield mounted detectors with an without the 9500ci running and the results were the same. Nice try again dumbfuck!
@stalkervision You should tell The Veillage Idiot that. Funny how that’s OK when that dumbass compares his non-retail, manufacturer supplied Whistler against his obviously performance hindered Belscort remotes, it’s all good, but when I do it, you fucktards don’t like it. I test pure retail units, he does not.
Also, Belscort remotes do not emit signals that would effect dash-mounted RDs, so if anything, the Whistler would negatively effect the 9500ci, not the other way around. Nice try.
@stalkervision The only people that don’t believe GoL test results are you stupid fucking Whistler fans that can’t accept the fact that your detectors perform at the bottom of the barrel. The data is easy to understand, except for those of you with too few brain cells. We set up a radar gun, turn it on and see how far each detector detects it. The tests are fair and equal for all detectors tested. So simple a child can understand it, but clearly too complex for dumbass Whistler fans.
@stalkervision Turning my 9500ci GPS proves that there is filtering in the city? That’s brilliant! Wow! I’ll have to make a note of that! Fucking retard!
yes I know its “claimed” it’s completely undetectable but the 9500 ci may be setting up “harmonics” outside the normal rd oscillator range but NOT is the spectre ranges. tHIS STILL MIGHTl effect the whistler FILTERING circuitry d’j. The ONLY way to tell is use them SEPARATELY.
You DO know running TWO RD’s together at the same time can effect each others sensitivity DJ. Some more then others. Look that up in the V1 site if you like. That’s really a beginners bone headed mistake.
@stalkervision Whatever you’ve seen the Whistler do, a more sensitive detector would have done better under the same circumstances. You have to be a fucking idiot to not understand that. Seriously. What would running my 9500ci in the city with GPS off prove? Fucking idiot!
@stalkervision Right…..and according to The Veillage Idiot’s videos, the Whistler SEs hang right with it. Not sure who’s dumber, you who believes his bullshit, or him, who writes that bullshit.
@stalkervision Why would I need to watch videos from Whistler fanboys when I tested these POSs myself? You may want to watch the two real world videos from snoopyc4 where the Whistler SE completely missed I/O shots that the 9500ci detected. The numbers show that these Whistlers are basically a reactive Cobra. On easy encounters, they do fine, but on tough encounters, they suck, many times missing the alert altogether. You’re clearly too fucking stupid to see what’s completely obvious..
@djrams80 I have seen lots and lots of video where they don’t suck D/J. Quite the opposite in fact. Running a detector through a city isn’t my idea of the best way to judge any detector. It’s yours? Isn’t the 9500 i a GPS equipped detector? can you test it with the gps off in the city ? That would be very interesting indeed.
@stalkervision It’s not my opinion. I put the Whistler SEs on my windshield and they sucked. Look at the video above. It missed a long duration I/O shot at like 1000ft! Seriously, what detector misses I/O shots at 1000ft? That’s not my opinion, THAT”S WHAT HAPPENED! THAT’S REALITY!
July 3rd, 2010 at 7:59 am
D/J do you even KNOW how your Escort filters out it’s LO signal and hides it? I do..
July 3rd, 2010 at 8:03 am
“real world tests”? As in driving up and down a city highway in 99% of these videos? maybe that’s your real world. it isn’t mine. I don’t know shit. Sorry buddy but I REALLY DO. Your the one defending a completely lame amateur retardo Rd testing club. Not I.
July 3rd, 2010 at 8:05 am
@djrams80 Yes i know. I was about to complain to you D/J about that.
Actually I am FAR from a “fanboy” in fact I really didn’t like whistler much till the SE i bought recently now. Hard to type from the couch with my computer D/J it isn’t a laptop. Wish i could. “sucky detector? LMAO ! Yes, most YT videos,ither then yours, show exactly how much it “sucks”
July 3rd, 2010 at 8:34 am
@stalkervision Stupid comments galore here. You clearly don’t know shit! Typical Whistler fanboy, sitting on your couch, defending your sucky detector while people like me do real world comparative testing on Whistler SEs for a month, do semi-controlled testing on a long straight away, around a curve, over a hill, with foam, without foam, etc.etc. I know how they cocmpare to other detectors. You don’t know shit, so shut the fuck up, you fucking retard!
July 3rd, 2010 at 9:27 am
@stalkervision That’s a wise move on your part. With a Whistler, you shouldn’t speed anywhere, because your detector sucks and you are unprotected.
July 3rd, 2010 at 10:07 am
@stalkervision Yes you did fucktard! You said that running two detectors can interfere with each other, which is apparently supposed to explain why the whistlers suck at detecting radar when I run them. Your implication was clearly that my M3 9500ci might be what causes the Whistler to suck. It sucks because it sucks. That’s it. The videos you refer to are always in the middle of fucking nowhere, where any detector would work fine. Give the Whistler any obstacle and it folds.
July 3rd, 2010 at 10:38 am
It is pretty fin arguing with you though D/J. You get so worked up! LOL! i have forgotten more about radar and radar detectors then you know know. EVERY RD encounter is different and every detector will act differently in each different encounter. DID you know this? That’s why I could immediately see your GOL tests are nothing a bunch of contrived BS.
July 3rd, 2010 at 11:17 am
and another thing I find pretty interesting D/J is 99 % of your comparison videos of the SE are done IN THE CITY ! Yes I often SPEED IN THE CITY. Some times doing well over 100 mph in school zones!
July 3rd, 2010 at 11:27 am
@djrams80 Hummm, “someone told me?” LOL! Always a classic ! I didn’t say the M3′s did that did I ? Not that I am aware. The GOl tests don’t reflect what your saying and from what you wrote a minute ago I can’t believe you did what you claim now. Franky the only D/F here is you since I have seen enough counter videos to your that show the SE has outstanding range.
July 3rd, 2010 at 12:05 pm
@stalkervision Now you’re going to try to teach me about harmonics? LOL! Wrong again. I’ve been told by someone that has done a full scan on Belscort M3 detectors that there is no signal emitted that would effect another RD outside of a 2 foot radius. The M3s do not beat Spectres by shifting their oscillator emissions.
During the over the hill testing, we tested the windshield mounted detectors with an without the 9500ci running and the results were the same. Nice try again dumbfuck!
July 3rd, 2010 at 12:50 pm
@stalkervision You should tell The Veillage Idiot that. Funny how that’s OK when that dumbass compares his non-retail, manufacturer supplied Whistler against his obviously performance hindered Belscort remotes, it’s all good, but when I do it, you fucktards don’t like it. I test pure retail units, he does not.
Also, Belscort remotes do not emit signals that would effect dash-mounted RDs, so if anything, the Whistler would negatively effect the 9500ci, not the other way around. Nice try.
July 3rd, 2010 at 1:50 pm
@stalkervision The only people that don’t believe GoL test results are you stupid fucking Whistler fans that can’t accept the fact that your detectors perform at the bottom of the barrel. The data is easy to understand, except for those of you with too few brain cells. We set up a radar gun, turn it on and see how far each detector detects it. The tests are fair and equal for all detectors tested. So simple a child can understand it, but clearly too complex for dumbass Whistler fans.
July 3rd, 2010 at 2:26 pm
@stalkervision Turning my 9500ci GPS proves that there is filtering in the city? That’s brilliant! Wow! I’ll have to make a note of that! Fucking retard!
July 3rd, 2010 at 3:13 pm
yes I know its “claimed” it’s completely undetectable but the 9500 ci may be setting up “harmonics” outside the normal rd oscillator range but NOT is the spectre ranges. tHIS STILL MIGHTl effect the whistler FILTERING circuitry d’j. The ONLY way to tell is use them SEPARATELY.
July 3rd, 2010 at 4:09 pm
You DO know running TWO RD’s together at the same time can effect each others sensitivity DJ. Some more then others. Look that up in the V1 site if you like. That’s really a beginners bone headed mistake.
July 3rd, 2010 at 4:26 pm
@djrams80 People that believe GOL tests..
July 3rd, 2010 at 4:53 pm
@djrams80 Your the “idiot” if you don’t know this already. AMAZING. It has to do with say..”filtering” in the “city”
July 3rd, 2010 at 5:29 pm
@stalkervision Whatever you’ve seen the Whistler do, a more sensitive detector would have done better under the same circumstances. You have to be a fucking idiot to not understand that. Seriously. What would running my 9500ci in the city with GPS off prove? Fucking idiot!
July 3rd, 2010 at 5:43 pm
@stalkervision Right…..and according to The Veillage Idiot’s videos, the Whistler SEs hang right with it. Not sure who’s dumber, you who believes his bullshit, or him, who writes that bullshit.
July 3rd, 2010 at 6:32 pm
@stalkervision Why would I need to watch videos from Whistler fanboys when I tested these POSs myself? You may want to watch the two real world videos from snoopyc4 where the Whistler SE completely missed I/O shots that the 9500ci detected. The numbers show that these Whistlers are basically a reactive Cobra. On easy encounters, they do fine, but on tough encounters, they suck, many times missing the alert altogether. You’re clearly too fucking stupid to see what’s completely obvious..
July 3rd, 2010 at 6:42 pm
You may just want to watch this video D/J of a whistler se that didn’t suck..Y/T
Whistler XTR-690SE radar detector detecting 34.7 Ka band radar PART 1
July 3rd, 2010 at 7:02 pm
Oh wait it’s a 1500 dollar Special hot REMOTE with GPS.. Hmmm…
July 3rd, 2010 at 7:44 pm
@djrams80 I have seen lots and lots of video where they don’t suck D/J. Quite the opposite in fact. Running a detector through a city isn’t my idea of the best way to judge any detector. It’s yours? Isn’t the 9500 i a GPS equipped detector? can you test it with the gps off in the city ? That would be very interesting indeed.
July 3rd, 2010 at 8:00 pm
@stalkervision It’s not my opinion. I put the Whistler SEs on my windshield and they sucked. Look at the video above. It missed a long duration I/O shot at like 1000ft! Seriously, what detector misses I/O shots at 1000ft? That’s not my opinion, THAT”S WHAT HAPPENED! THAT’S REALITY!
July 3rd, 2010 at 8:58 pm
Thanks for the videos though. I am always happy to look at new detector video postings.