<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: V1 &#8211; 9500ci &#8211; RX65e &#8211; RX65 &#8211; Pro78 &#8211; 1734 vs Ramet AD9 C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c</link>
	<description>Radar Detector Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDtestaaa</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>RDtestaaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-348</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Sure! &quot;U&quot; &amp; X band ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Sure! &quot;U&quot; &amp; X band enabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sure! &#8220;U&#8221; &amp; X band &#8230;</b> <br /> Sure! &#8220;U&#8221; &amp; X band enabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowan4321</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>rowan4321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-349</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;was the V1 in Euro ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; was the V1 in Euro mode</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>was the V1 in Euro &#8230;</b> <br /> was the V1 in Euro mode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDtestaaa</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>RDtestaaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-350</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;yes&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>yes</b> <br /> yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowan4321</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>rowan4321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-351</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Was the Pro 78 in ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Was the Pro 78 in REV C mode &#039; pop &#039; off &#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Was the Pro 78 in &#8230;</b> <br /> Was the Pro 78 in REV C mode &#8216; pop &#8216; off &#8216;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDtestaaa</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>RDtestaaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-352</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;We tested it very ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; We tested it very carefully in other car with a windshield which had no visual or athermic surface. Results were the same or even slightly worse. The &quot;test&quot; place in a car from vid is OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>We tested it very &#8230;</b> <br /> We tested it very carefully in other car with a windshield which had no visual or athermic surface. Results were the same or even slightly worse. The &#8220;test&#8221; place in a car from vid is OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowan4321</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>rowan4321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-353</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Why put them all ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Why put them all behind the tinited sun visor strip - which has been known to affect warning distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Why put them all &#8230;</b> <br /> Why put them all behind the tinited sun visor strip &#8211; which has been known to affect warning distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RDtestaaa</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>RDtestaaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-354</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Antenna module was ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Antenna module was 15-20 cm from the ground, and behind horizontal, thin, plastic (not painted) element of a bumper. But it&#039;s not there anymore. Since there were some doubts of possible radar signal bothering, antenna has been moved a little to secure unobstructed view. More tests soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Antenna module was &#8230;</b> <br /> Antenna module was 15-20 cm from the ground, and behind horizontal, thin, plastic (not painted) element of a bumper. But it&#8217;s not there anymore. Since there were some doubts of possible radar signal bothering, antenna has been moved a little to secure unobstructed view. More tests soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smadamaf</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>smadamaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-355</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Where exactly is ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Where exactly is your Escort 9500ci mounted and is something blocking its signal at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Where exactly is &#8230;</b> <br /> Where exactly is your Escort 9500ci mounted and is something blocking its signal at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smadamaf</title>
		<link>http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c/comment-page-1#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>smadamaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/escort-9500ci-radar-detectors/v1-9500ci-rx65e-rx65-pro78-1734-vs-ramet-ad9-c#comment-356</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Valentine One for ...&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; Valentine One for the win!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Valentine One for &#8230;</b> <br /> Valentine One for the win!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

