Comments on: 9500ci Vertical – V1 – RX65e against Ramet AD9 C

By: shaunskii

shaunskii — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

Better get your …
Better get your rx65e checked out, must be bad. I had an older version rx65 about a 2 years ago and it would alert me FAR before your rx65e would. Nice real world tests. Check out “Radar Roy”, he is the king of testing radar detectors….

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

That particular one …
That particular one – don’t.

By: rowan4321

rowan4321 — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

no worries some do …
no worries some do some dont

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

That UV sun visor …
That UV sun visor strip gives completely no influence to radar signal – tested many times period.

By: rowan4321

rowan4321 — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

it appears the V1 + …
it appears the V1 + Rx65 are behind the anti UV sun visor strip -
also if you have the chance in the future can you try mounting the V1 vertical against this Ka with Euro Mode oFF usually is more effective when vertically mounted.

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

As far as I know …
As far as I know there is no detection difference between 6.5 and 6.4 revision of RX65e. Notice that V1 doesn’t show off in that place also.

By: GZhgb

GZhgb — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:30:07 +0000

Put detectors to …
Put detectors to Vertical is good for ka band detection,i also do this tests. Why not put the v1 Vertical? I ‘seems that rx65e 6.5 no good as rx65e ver 6.4 …..