Comments on: RX65e vs RX65 – K band test – Is there any difference?

By: keekee1973

keekee1973 — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

Fortunately we …
Fortunately we don’t have here, only a few Multanova6 Fs…. It’s time to the detector-manufacturers to build their detectors with H and V polarized antennas

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

Yeah, you’re right. …
Yeah, you’re right. But if you meet Multaradar C with vertically mounted detector, you’re toasted!

By: keekee1973

keekee1973 — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

We have run several …
We have run several test against Ka-band Ramet AD9 in Hungary, and all the RX65s (Intl and euro) giving even better results with vertical installation! It’s more important, when those f..g boxes looking the BACK of the cars!!! Any other cheaper detector are useless

By: keekee1973

keekee1973 — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

I think the …
I think the difference between the Intl and the euro version is on the noise-cancelling threshold… In Europe we are “using” weak K and Ka band radars, so the european RX65 has lower limit to alert… And to the Ka band : of course the narrow-band frequency sweeping makes it more “sensitive”

By: prestissimoLIVE

prestissimoLIVE — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

mam RX65 i 400 …
mam RX65 i 400 metrów wystarcza by zwolnić. Mógłby ten RX65 byc czulszy na ramera AD9T ale mozna sobie poradzić.

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

Had got – past form …
Had got – past form of have got. But I agree that the “got” could be omitted from that sentence, without changing the meaning.
I see in turn that your polish is quite well. Good job. You should only work on word order and punctuation and everything will be ok.
Anyway, don’t you think that grammar comment on a Radar Detectors channel is pathetic?

By: wielkinieznajom

wielkinieznajom — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

Kolego napisałeś po …
Kolego napisałeś po angielsku z błędem. Nie ma takiego czegoś jak “had got” jest “had” albo “have had”.

By: RDtestaaa

RDtestaaa — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

There is no doubt – …
There is no doubt – RX65e is better on K – it’s confirmed by many experiences with RX65, V995 and X50. RX65e has Ka Narrow – here we had got KaN1=34.00GHz and KaN2=34.30GHz (+/- 100MHz) so the difference on Ka is even bigger. But why it affects performance on K? I have no idea. But it works!

By: ripperuL

ripperuL — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:01:12 +0000

it seems …
it seems better.what about Ka band?maybe some freq. is missing?