30 Jan

RX65e vs RX65 – K band test – Is there any difference?

Author: admin  |  Category: bel rx65 radar detectors

Bel Pro RX65e rev 6.4 vs Bel Pro RX65 rev 6.1 against Fotorapid C photoradar (K band – 24.125 GHz). Both units in Highway mode, X-K-Ka ON, POP-SWS OFF (RX65e Ka Narrow: KaN1, KaN2).

Duration : 0:2:0


[youtube 3e_3lrMKe6I]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “RX65e vs RX65 – K band test – Is there any difference?”

  1. keekee1973 Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Fortunately we …
    Fortunately we don’t have here, only a few Multanova6 Fs…. It’s time to the detector-manufacturers to build their detectors with H and V polarized antennas :D

  2. RDtestaaa Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Yeah, you’re right. …
    Yeah, you’re right. But if you meet Multaradar C with vertically mounted detector, you’re toasted!

  3. keekee1973 Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    We have run several …
    We have run several test against Ka-band Ramet AD9 in Hungary, and all the RX65s (Intl and euro) giving even better results with vertical installation! It’s more important, when those f..g boxes looking the BACK of the cars!!! Any other cheaper detector are useless :(

  4. keekee1973 Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    I think the …
    I think the difference between the Intl and the euro version is on the noise-cancelling threshold… In Europe we are “using” weak K and Ka band radars, so the european RX65 has lower limit to alert… And to the Ka band : of course the narrow-band frequency sweeping makes it more “sensitive”

  5. prestissimoLIVE Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    mam RX65 i 400 …
    mam RX65 i 400 metrów wystarcza by zwolnić. Mógłby ten RX65 byc czulszy na ramera AD9T ale mozna sobie poradzić.

  6. RDtestaaa Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Had got – past form …
    Had got – past form of have got. But I agree that the “got” could be omitted from that sentence, without changing the meaning.
    I see in turn that your polish is quite well. Good job. You should only work on word order and punctuation and everything will be ok.
    Anyway, don’t you think that grammar comment on a Radar Detectors channel is pathetic?

  7. wielkinieznajom Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Kolego napisałeś po …
    Kolego napisałeś po angielsku z błędem. Nie ma takiego czegoś jak “had got” jest “had” albo “have had”.

  8. RDtestaaa Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    There is no doubt – …
    There is no doubt – RX65e is better on K – it’s confirmed by many experiences with RX65, V995 and X50. RX65e has Ka Narrow – here we had got KaN1=34.00GHz and KaN2=34.30GHz (+/- 100MHz) so the difference on Ka is even bigger. But why it affects performance on K? I have no idea. But it works!

  9. ripperuL Says:
    January 30th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    it seems …
    it seems better.what about Ka band?maybe some freq. is missing?

Leave a Reply