Comments on: K-Band test http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test Radar Detector Reviews Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:29:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: neegrow http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1333 neegrow Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:59:26 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1333 was the rx65 tested again later with similar results? Your K source could have been less effecient when warmed up, disturbing the results for the later-tested units... results would be most accurate using 3 or more passes, averaged. also: affect (not effect) was the rx65 tested again later with similar results? Your K source could have been less effecient when warmed up, disturbing the results for the later-tested units… results would be most accurate using 3 or more passes, averaged.

also: affect (not effect)

]]> By: Cubit100 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1332 Cubit100 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:16:52 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1332 You are assuming that the RX65 was tested first. It seems obvious that the videos were presented in the order of detection performance from best to worst. You are assuming that the RX65 was tested first. It seems obvious that the videos were presented in the order of detection performance from best to worst.

]]> By: marzolian http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1331 marzolian Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:02:28 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1331 The video is pretty dull. There's no reason to show every second of every test. Just show the setup, then give a table with results. Plus, I would have measured the distance from the detection point to the radar source instead of time. Interesting idea for a test. The video is pretty dull. There’s no reason to show every second of every test. Just show the setup, then give a table with results. Plus, I would have measured the distance from the detection point to the radar source instead of time. Interesting idea for a test.

]]> By: compu44 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1330 compu44 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:52:09 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1330 I did several runs with the RX65 at different points in the testing and got the exact same times with each run. Same with the X50. I did several runs with the RX65 at different points in the testing and got the exact same times with each run. Same with the X50.

]]> By: compu44 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1329 compu44 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:36:03 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1329 The reason I showed the runs was to eliminate any arguments that I had no proof of findings. Anyone can type out numbers, and as such anyone can contest those numbers. I have video evidence. The reason I showed the runs was to eliminate any arguments that I had no proof of findings. Anyone can type out numbers, and as such anyone can contest those numbers. I have video evidence.

]]> By: compu44 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1328 compu44 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:32:52 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1328 Correct, results were arranged from longest detection to shortest. Correct, results were arranged from longest detection to shortest.

]]> By: maskelll http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1327 maskelll Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:44:24 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1327 this was awesome. thank you. recieved a ticket last week.. am now investing in a radar detector. this was awesome. thank you. recieved a ticket last week.. am now investing in a radar detector.

]]> By: iwant2bbuff http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1326 iwant2bbuff Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:22:12 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1326 I'm looking for a new radar detector. Preferably a escort 8500x50 or V1. which do you prefer? and is the escort x50 revision 6.1 any better? thanks I’m looking for a new radar detector. Preferably a escort 8500×50 or V1. which do you prefer? and is the escort x50 revision 6.1 any better? thanks

]]> By: airgreek http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1325 airgreek Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:37:14 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1325 The only surprising result to me is the X50. At our GOL tests the X50 does good on K band. The V1 would have given you about a 30 second warning if I had to guess The only surprising result to me is the X50. At our GOL tests the X50 does good on K band. The V1 would have given you about a 30 second warning if I had to guess

]]> By: compu44 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test/comment-page-1#comment-1324 compu44 Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:43:00 +0000 http://www.radardetectorexperts.com/bel-rx65-radar-detectors/k-band-test#comment-1324 I do own a V1 now, and based on what I have seen with the K-Band detection on it, i'd say it's about even with the older RX65s like the one in the test. The X50 is a 6.1 revision based on the "M4" platform, which does have weaker K-Band performance than the older ones. I do own a V1 now, and based on what I have seen with the K-Band detection on it, i’d say it’s about even with the older RX65s like the one in the test. The X50 is a 6.1 revision based on the “M4″ platform, which does have weaker K-Band performance than the older ones.

]]>